I oppose same-sex marriage (and no, I'm not a bigot)
Posted May 28, 2015 09:14:02
We are told there are those in favour of same-sex marriage, and then there are the bigots. But allow me to make the case for traditional marriage as being between one man and one woman, writes Michael Jensen.
The passing of the Irish referendum on same-sex marriage has triggered a round of Australian advocates announcing that it is now "our turn". We lag behind the UK, many European countries, some states in the US, and (perish the thought!) New Zealand, and we ought to get with the programme.
The Leader of the Opposition, Bill Shorten, in line with the new ALP dogma, has announced that he is introducing a private members bill into Parliament next Monday. He has said:
It's time for our laws to reflect the values of modern Australia and to include everyone as equals ... It's time for marriage equality.
Whatever our religious views about marriage ... I believe we have to change this law which discriminates against adult couples on the basis of who they love.
How could anyone stand opposed? The terms in which the pro-marriage redefinition case are stated make it sound as inevitable as the dawn, and as unstoppable as the tide. And these same terms make opposing a redefinition of marriage sound primitive and even barbaric. There are those in favour of change, we are told, and then there are the bigots.
But simply saying "it's time" doesn't make an argument. Neither does the need to keep up with the O'Haras, the Smiths, and the Pedersens. Neither does the support of TV stars, comedians, or even Bono. At best, these are arguments from fashion.
It is not even the case that "all the surveys say Australians want it" is a sufficient argument. The surveys say that Australians want capital punishment. Wisely, our politicians don't listen to surveys on that issue (and I agree with them). They should exercise leadership, not follow opinion.
Get The Drum in your inboxSubscribe to get The Drum delivered to your email twice a day, plus top news headlines and alerts on major breaking stories.
Could it be that if you haven't heard the case opposing a change to the marriage law, it is because the language of those advocating it has been so emotive that the contrary case can't be heard above the noise? Could it really be said that a civil disagreement has taken place? I am not confident that it has.
I would like to make the case for traditional marriage as being between one man and one woman; but to do so with some important qualifications.
One of them is this: if the Marriage Act changes, this is not the end of the world for me. There are greater causes in this world than this. I am more distressed by our inattention to children in detention, or our national greed problem, than by the possibility that the definition of marriage might be changed.
Another is that I stand adamantly against the bullying and vilification of people of minority sexual identities.
Nevertheless, I don't think that the case for change is anywhere near as convincing as its proponents think it is. The case has been made almost entirely in terms of "equality" and its alleged opposite: "discrimination". The argument is that applying the word "marriage" to some relationships and not to others is unequal treatment, and thus discrimination. These are both apparently self-evidently bad.
But it is the duty of the law to judiciously discriminate and to appropriately recognise difference with, at times, unequal treatment of things that are not the same. It isn't automatically wrong to discriminate per se.
In fact, it may be the case that offering supposedly "equal" treatment is incoherent, as it is in this case. It is crucial to notice that the proposed revision of marriage laws involves exactly that: a revision of marriage. In order to offer the status of marriage to couples of the same sex, the very meaning of marriage has to be changed. In which case, what same-sex couples will have will not be the same as what differently sexed couples now have.
It will be called marriage, but it won't be marriage as we know it. It won't be "marriage equality": it will be an entirely new thing.
This is where Bill Shorten again misunderstands what marriage is. As we now understand it, marriage is not merely the expression of a love people have for each other. It is, or is intended as, a life-long union between two people who exemplify the biological duality of the human race, with the openness to welcoming children into the world. Even when children do not arrive, the differentiated twoness of marriage indicates its inherent structure.
Now, I didn't pluck this definition from the sky, nor is it simply a piece of religious teaching. It is the meaning of marriage that emerges from all human cultures as they reflect on and experience what it is to be male and female. It is only in the last 15 years that anyone has seriously thought differently.
I prepare many couples for marriage each year. Most of them already cohabit. When I ask them about marriage, they almost always indicate that it is for them the beginning of a new family unit open to welcoming children.
A child is a tangible expression of our sexed twoness.
To remove the sexual specificity from the notion of marriage makes marriage not a realisation of the bodily difference between male and female that protects and dignifies each, but simply a matter of choice.
This is precisely what many pro-revision advocates themselves argue: that a new definition of marriage would establish marriage as a new thing altogether. As Brandeis University's E.J Graff puts it, a change in marriage law would mean that marriage would "ever after stand for sexual choice, forcutting the link between sex and diapers".
Instead of the particular orientation of marriage towards the bearing and nurture of children, we will have a kind of marriage in which the central reality is my emotional choice. It will be the triumph, in the end, of the will.
The revisionist case has not provided a clear and reasonable definition of marriage beyond saying that if two people want to call their relationship by that name, they should be able to by choice.
Now, having put that opinion forward, I fully recognise that there are many people of intelligence and good will who disagree. I do not expect to convince everyone. What I do hope is that my contribution here will not be derided as bigoted or homophobic out of hand, but that it will be seen as part of a civil discussion.
Rev Dr Michael Jensen is the rector at St Mark's Anglican Church, Darling Point, and is the author of My God, My God: Is It Possible To Believe Anymore?
Topics:government-and-politics, gays-and-lesbians, marriage
I Love My Gay Friends
- Length: 651 words (1.9 double-spaced pages)
- Rating: Excellent
I Love My Gay Friends
I've grown up around gays and lesbians, and some of my best friends are gay, so I support them. One day I was on my way downtown after school and saw a crowd. I figured it was another peace march since it was only a week after September 11th, but it wasn't.
My friend and I were sitting on the wall in front of Jimmy Johns and talking when our friend, Mary, ran up to us.
"You guys should come and help us out. They're protesting against gay people and saying God doesn't love us," she said.
As we joined our friends across the road from the Christian protesters, I thought back to church and remembered my preacher saying that God loves everyone. A guy came over and told us the protesters were from out of state and were here because ours was one of the largest gay communities in the country. I thought, I wish we were the gayest community, all happy and stuff.
My friend grabbed my arm and pulled me aside, saying, "We have to stand up to this. We should make our own signs." I agreed, and we headed to a shop we often visit. I made a sign that said, I'm not gay, but I love my gay friends.
On our way through the crowd, we saw the pastor from the church. She said she wanted three people to go with her to talk with the protesters, and be kind to them. Great, I was chosen. I walked with my head held high, listening to their screams of hate. This wouldn't be easy, but maybe someone would listen.
I approached a young guy holding two anti-gay signs. One said, AIDS cures fags, the other proclaimed, Fag sin is filthy.
"Hey, would you mind explaining to me the purpose of all this hate?" I asked, thinking he would be really cute if he weren't holding those nasty signs.
"This town needs help," he replied.
"Do you really believe that God hates?" I asked.
"Yes, He does," he said, and showed me a Bible verse that read, "God hates the work of iniquity."
"Yes, but not the workers. He loves everyone," I countered.
"No, you are mistaken. Go ask a preacher," he said, sounding angry.
How to Cite this Page
| Is Being Gay, Okay? Essay - Most people have grown up in a society where being a homosexual is not okay. Although LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender) people are being more accepted, they are still thought as ‘wrong’ to a lot of people and places. A big argument is that being gay is “unnatural” however, it is found that homosexuality is practiced in over 1,500 animal species such as giraffes, lions, and several species of apes and monkeys. We believe the hate against homosexuality should decrease, and the homosexual rights should increase.... [tags: Homosexuals, Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual. Trans]|
:: 14 Works Cited
| Essay about America Needs Gay Marriage and Same-sex Adoption - Families gather together in their backyards to celebrate America’s birth and get ready to light fireworks. Children chatter excitedly to themselves as their fathers bring out the cases of fireworks bought from the local grocery store. Mothers talk among themselves, stirring their glasses of lemonade absently. This picture, so common in society, will sound unfamiliar to very few. Every year, on July 4th, Americans commemorate the birth of their prestigious country; yet a question arises as to whether or not they remember what they are truly celebrating.... [tags: Gay Rights, Lesbian Rights]|
:: 17 Works Cited
| Gay Marriage Should Be Legal Essay examples - 'Would legalization of gay marriage be good for the gay community?' Sam Isaacson wrote an article analyzing the opinion of the gay community on legalizing same sex marriages. It is somewhat of a controversial issue with the gay community whether or not marriage is a good thing. He divides the community into two groups: integrationists and liberationists. The controversy is caused because of these two different philosophical views. The integrationists want to be as normal as can be. They want to 'integrate' themselves into society.... [tags: Papers Gay Marriage Homosexual Essays]|
:: 1 Works Cited
|Everyone Needs Love Essay - David has been my best friend since eighth grade. He has helped me through countless breakups and heartbreaks, he has held me while I cried, and he has taken up for me when I need friend. My mother will tell you that he is like the son she never had, and my friends will tell you that it is a wonder how, after six years of being best friends, we haven’t found a way to kill each other. Some years ago, David nervously told me that he was gay. He has grown up in the church all of his life, his parents are openly “anti-gay,” and therefore, David is forced to a life of secrecy.... [tags: Essay About Love]||1679 words|
| Gay Marriage Must Be Legal Essay - Legal marriage is the right of all Americans regardless of their sexual orientation. Gay marriage is certainly a hot button issue. It invokes an emotional dialogue filled with passion, rage, hate and fear. However, at the base of it all, are two people who are in a committed relationship living normal and productive lives and contributing to society in a positive manner. This issue is being debated in every state of the union, and will eventually go to the Supreme Court. Gay people want to formalize their relationship and gain some of the legal standing and support that is given to heterosexual couples on a daily basis.... [tags: Pro Same Sex Marriage Essays]|
:: 5 Works Cited
| Make Gay Marriage Legal Essay - Marriage is a natural right that everyone deserves and for the gay community that right is a constant struggle. The gay community want to show the person that they publicly promise to be with them. Gay couples are constantly fighting for their right to marry. They are fighting to have everything a “normal” heterosexual couple has within their relationship. Although society is changing and becoming more accepting of other ideas, then the concept of traditional marriage between a man and woman, it is still a constant battle trying to add gay marriage as a legal binding commitment.... [tags: Same-Sex Marriage Essays]|
:: 6 Works Cited
| The Gay Marriage Controversy Essay - Gay marriage has been a huge controversy in our world for a long time now. According to the Annenberg Classroom, gay marriage only started becoming legal in 2000. Although it was not legal until 2000, gay couples were getting married on television shows in the 1990’s. Sitcom Roseanne featured a gay marriage in 1995, while Friends featured a lesbian wedding in 1996. Today, it is only legal in eight states and seventeen countries. Scotland is the most recent country to legalize gay marriage in February of 2014.... [tags: same sex legislation]|
:: 9 Works Cited
|Essay on Gay Is Okay - Gay is Okay. Should gays be treated with the same respect as all other people. Conservative Christians and gay people are going at it again. They never seem to tire of this war. Only few Christians have the guts to admit that they believe that all gays should be treated with the same respect as any other people. It seems that only a person with a number of gay and lesbian friends and acquaintances can realize the importance of getting to know the people behind the labels and images society makes; and their experience of building connections with people of many different backgrounds and personal differences has been both challenging and tremendously rewarding.... [tags: essays research papers]||1524 words|
| Gay Marriage Should Be Legal Essay - On June 26, 2015, the US Supreme Court ruled that the US Constitution guarantees the right for same-sex couples to marry. Should gay marriages really be allowed. Has the Supreme Court ruled in error. In our society today, homosexuals are treated unconstitutionally, they are forced to live a secret life, they are forbidden to adopt and raise children and unable to marry the person they love. This is just a few to the many inequalities that homosexuals face in everyday life. The constitution guarantees the right to free speech and the right to pursue happiness to everyone, although homosexuals do not get to live their life by their choice.... [tags: Same-Sex Marriage Essays]|
:: 2 Works Cited
| Gay Marriages Essay - Gay Marriages Growing up in a heterosexual neighborhood, gay couples were not something that you came across every day as you do in today’s time. At the age of 22, Dawn was introduced to her first gay couple, Mike and Thomas. They were friends of her husband. She had never known a gay couple before or even a gay person. It was extremely strange and uncomfortable for Dawn to be in the presence of two gay men. It was nothing out of the ordinary at first. To Dawn, it was just like two men living together as roommates until they kissed.... [tags: Argumentative Persuasive Essays]|
:: 3 Works Cited
Three People One Day Cures Preacher September 11th Lesbians Downtown Verse Loves Signs
I was confused and couldn't understand why they were preaching God's word with hate. I walked on and happened to find their pastor, standing silently, holding his Bible.
"Do you believe God hates the sin or the sinner?" I asked.
He replied, "God hates the sinner." I couldn't believe they believed God would hate his own children.
I thought back to Sunday school in my Pentecostal church. Sister Bell asked if I had taken a piece of candy and I said no, even though I had.
"It is a sin to lie," she told me.
"Does God hate me for sinning?"
"No, God hates your sin, not you," she answered. Now these protesters were trying to tell me something different.
The next day, they were back. I went back to make another sign: If these are the type of people in heaven, we would rather burn in hell. As we walked around the protesters, a train formed. Chuck and I were the leaders, but at the same time we were all equal. As we marched around them, we sang: "Jesus loves me, yes I know, for the Bible tells me so. And Jesus loves all the little children of the world, red and yellow, black and white, gay or straight."
Our words and actions amazed the people who said God hates, and they left. They probably thought I was gay, but my only point was that I love my gay friends, and so does God.