Does Power Always Corrupt Essay

A few years ago, I published a paper in the journal Science showing that even small children can predict the results of parliamentary elections with two candidates merely by looking at their photographs. As you might imagine, the result caused quite a stir, and it led to an interesting discussion with a journalist.

After a debate over the presidential elections in the US, a journalist and I began to discuss the case of former Italian prime minister Silvio Berlusconi. The journalist wanted me to explain why Berlusconi was so power-hungry; what factors might explain his character and his sexual escapades?

I did not want to answer. I don’t like to respond on particular cases because it’s hard to know if a single case is indicative of a causal relationship. However, after persistent questioning, I blurted out a response: “I don’t know. Maybe it is because of his testosterone?”

But an answer given out of frustration and in the heat of the moment became prophetic. We know that the hormone testosterone indicates reduced empathy and increased antisocial behavior, as well as controlling sexual behaviour. So when planning a study on leader corruption with my colleagues, I thought it might be interesting to measure testosterone too.

What we wanted to study was the question of whether power really corrupts. We recently published our findings in the Leadership Quarterly.

Does power corrupt?

Answering this question using observational data is not easy. It is possible that power corrupts, but it is also possible that some individuals have a natural inclination to seek power because they are corrupt at heart. We were therefore interested to see if stable traits or dispositions that we could measure, such as personality (for example, honesty) or physiological factors (such as testosterone levels), mattered for corruption.

To know whether power does corrupt we had to exogenously manipulate power; we gave power to a random group of participants and observed how they behaved. By random assignment, we ensured we had roughly equal numbers of similar individuals (honest, smart, corrupt, men, women, and so on) in our experimental and control groups. If we found differences in levels of corruption, the explanation could not therefore be that the groups comprised different types of people at the outset.

We set up two lab experiments. Participants played what is called a dictator game. The dictator, referred to as the “leader” in the experiment, could decide how to apportion a sum of money between himself or herself, and his or her team. They had to make choices between serving the greater good – doing what’s right for public welfare by increasing the team’s payout – or serving oneself, thereby increasing the leader’s payout but destroying public welfare.

We also manipulated the number of followers for each leader: the leaders either had one follower (low-power leaders), or three (high-power leaders). Low-power leaders had few choices with respect to abusing their power and high-power leaders were given more options. We then allowed the leaders to take decisions about payouts.

What did we find?

In the first experiment, results showed that high-power leaders took antisocial decisions at a significantly higher rate than low-power leaders.

The second experiment was more complex: we added a time component and monitored participants’ individual differences as predictors of their behaviour. Prior to becoming leaders or followers, we asked participants to vote on what a responsible leader should do with respect to payouts. Most endorsed the pro-social option; just 3.33% said that leaders should take antisocial decisions.

Yet, when they became leaders, participants succumbed to the corruptive effects of power. Interestingly, honest individuals were initially shielded from taking antisocial decisions – but, with time, even they slid down the slippery, corrupting slope of power. Even more interesting was our observation that those who had high levels of testosterone were most corrupt when they had high power.

Our findings have important implications for the design of institutions. Leaders prefer to have decision-making autonomy and lots of discretion. Yet we know from our study, and others too, that power can go to leaders’ heads.

Perhaps our findings do not explain everything about dominant high-profile individuals such as Robert Mugabe, Silvio Berlusconi, or Dominique Strauss-Kahn, or their contemporaries in the corporate world. But they do suggest that institutions should limit how much their leaders are allowed to sip from the seductive chalice of power.

John Antonakis is professor of organisation behavior at HEC Lausanne, the business school at the University of Lausanne

Read more like this:

The leadership hub is funded by Xyntéo. All content is editorially independent except for pieces labelled ‘brought to you by’. Find out more here.

Join the community of sustainability professionals and experts. Become a GSB member to get more stories like this direct to your inbox

Absolute Power Does Not Corrupt Absolutely

A man named Lord Actor once said, "Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men." This means that giving a person some power can turn them into a bad person. However, giving someone absolute power will always corrupt some and that these people are always bad. Knowing what the quote means the question remains, is the quote true? The answer is no. "Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men." This is because nothing is always anything, a person’s bad deeds can be outdone by good deeds, and corruption is a matter of opinion.

Nothing in the world we live in is always anything. Even though there is what we call "facts," even those facts are sometimes disproven with other facts showing the falsity of that fact. This same idea can be applied to the idea that a person given absolute power will always be corrupted. Just as it does not always rain when it is supposed to, an absolute monarch is not always bad. If there is even one example that shows otherwise, you might come to the conclusion that the statement is false, and that example is Maria Theresa. When Maria Theresa came into power she deemed herself an "absolute monarch" in order to have more control over her people, but she used this absolute power to create many successful reforms such as making the feudal system fairer to the serfs and giving them rights. One of those rights was limiting the amount of time they could work per day. Maria thought this would improve productivity and living standards. Reforms such as these made her country prosperous during her rule. Phillip II, Louis XIV, and Fredrick II were all the same way, they may have shown some sign of corruption that may have sown badness, but all of them made contributions to their countries. Proving nothing is always anything.

Just as there are usually two sides to every story and two sides of a person, there are even sometimes two sides to someone’s actions. There is no disproving that there are bad leaders in existence, but you could say that even these rulers offered something that might outweigh their bad deeds. An example of this would be Fredrick I whom used his father’s methods of warfare as a means of gaining power. Of course since Fredrick II started wars, there are casualties of war which would make some modern...

Loading: Checking Spelling

0%

Read more

Rights and Freedoms guaranteed in the Charter should be limited. They should not be absolute. Discuss.

636 words - 3 pages This essay states and explains the reason behind this statement. It explains some of the Charter's effects and limitations. I have examined several ponit of views in this esssay such as the historical point of view, the moral/ethical point of view and the current point of view. I have supported and explained these points through a well know quote about absolute power by Lord Acton,an English historian.Lord Acton, an English historian,...

King Lear - Power Corrupts Essay

784 words - 3 pages Power is the ability to manipulate and control whatever one desires; to do what one pleases to do without answering to authority. The power that corrupts the characters plays an extensive role throughout Shakespeare’s play, King Lear. Goneril and Regan are corrupted by the power that Lear offers them. Edmund’s corruption comes from the trust of his father. Absolute power corrupts absolutely with the characters, because once have full control,...

About the book "Animal Farm" by George Orwell. How power corrupts and how absoloute power corrupts absoloutelty.

1187 words - 5 pages Authors often present the idea in their novels that the more powerful a character becomes the more likely they are to be corrupt and if they gain absolute power that they will become absolutely corrupt. A text that illustrates this, is "

Theme of Power Corruption in Animal Farm, by George Orwell

1775 words - 7 pages Power can have the persuasive action in undoing the moral ethics of one’s character. This can be seen throughout history, such as World War II and proven by the actions of Napoleon in the allegory, Animal Farm, by George Orwell. As Lord Acton said “Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely.” In history what was viewed as a villain or wrong doer is never the same as the perception. A leader does not begin wanting to do wrong,...

"The Lord of the Flies" by William Golding

715 words - 3 pages The famous quote by Lord Action, "Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely" is proven to be true by the actions of the character Jack, in the novel "Lord of the...

Animal Farm Essay

1170 words - 5 pages In George Orwell’s novel Animal Farm, a major turning point in the novel was when Napoleon used his secret police force, his dogs, to exile Snowball. Snowball had previously been trying to improve the animal’s lives for the future by building a windmill. After Snowball was exiled, Napoleon became leader and everything immediately went amiss. Orwell stated that: "Somehow it seemed as though the farm had grown richer without making the animals...

An explaination of the 1st admendment and why it is so important.

570 words - 2 pages Public demonstrators lock arms, hold up signs, and chant. They are protesting any number of issues that seem to plague our nation. They cry out that our government is corrupt, that we should do away with it. In many other countries, government officials would have arrested and thrown these mere protesters in jail. Yet, it the land of the free, and home of the brave, they are allowed to continue so long as they are peaceful and cause no harm to...

Thomas Hobbes' Ideas on Monarchy

1264 words - 5 pages Assessment on Hobbes' Ideas on Monarchy Thomas Hobbes was a proponent of the monarchal system and in this paper I will prove that Hobbes was right in supporting the monarchal system of government, I will also show the opposing school of thought, and finally, I will give you my opinion on the monarchal system. Thomas Hobbes lived from 1588-1679 and throughout most of his life there was violence going on all around him. The biggest case was the...

Political Corruption

1508 words - 6 pages Political corruption has existed throughout the ages. It believed to be most prominent in positions of power, because of the role money plays in getting people power. However, over the centuries, corruption has changed so much so as to not match a particular definition of corruption, perpetually growing deceptively harder to find (Ebbe). The broadest, most suitable definition which exists today simply states that corruption is any illegal act...

How Power Corrupted the Pigs

646 words - 3 pages The satire Animal Farm by George Orwell expresses the idea of self-government through the animals. The...

Absolute Power: Leadership of a Single Person within Government

1522 words - 6 pages Absolute Power Throughout literature many works have stemmed from the subject of power. In many great stories some powerful warriors have fought for power only to fall in the end because of its inescapable corruption. There have also been those who stumbled into power blindly only to be dissatis fied and shunned because of a prophecy and fate. That predicament is what transpired in the unfortunate events of Oedipus Rex. Unjustly maintained...

0 comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *